Americans who stood against the Jewish tyranny?
(If we have to choose between the Negev and America, we will keep the Negev … Jewish leadership)  Part 1.
-Jewish character - one-way street. “These people [Jews] are anxious to obtain a great deal in the way American training and equipment, but are willing to give nothing in return…. American Military Attache in Israel Colonel E.P. Archibald
- Jews always have a patron. Air Force Chief of Staff grills the military attaché for criticizing the Jews
- Jewish Communist connection. “The admixture of European races in Palestine offers a unique opportunity for Soviet penetration into a strategic area…. Acting Secretary of Robert Lovett
- Jewish character – corrupt the world. “Israeli government had employed American journalists to “blackmail” the United States into providing training assistance. … The U.S. Army Attache in Tel Aviv, Colonel Andrus
-Jews hidden agenda … occupation of Muslim Palestine and beyond. Jews accepted Partition Resolution to deceive the world. “The JCS listed the objectives as (a) initial Jewish sovereignty over a portion of Palestine, (b) acceptance by the great powers of the right to unlimited immigration, (c) the extension of Jewish sovereignty over all Palestine, (d) the expansion of “Eretz Israel” into Transjordan and into portions of Lebanon and Syria, and (e) the establishment of Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East… Joint Chiefs of Staff Paper
M.A., LL.B. Researcher – International Affairs
It is 1949. Jewish tyranny has come full circle. Harry S. Truman, grandson of Jewish Solomon, rules America and is determined to maintain the “restoration”/occupation of the European Jews in the Muslim Palestine. Even in these moments of darkness, patriotic Americans stationed in Israel are exposing the arrogant, non-cooperative, and ungrateful nature of the Jews, risking their careers and even life. They are informing their superiors that Jews are restraining their activities and they are firing upon them. They are labeling Israel as enemy and requesting to treat it like an enemy. These patriots stationed in Israel are not alone. Their some colleagues back home are also fulfilling their patriotic obligations by informing their superiors that Truman administration pro-Jewish stance has alienated Arabs and Jews have a hidden agenda. Note the few Americans who stood against the Jewish tyranny
1. American patriot Colonel E.P. Archibald. In his yearly report to the Directorate Intelligence, Colonel Archibald highlights the following facts.
“These people [Jews] are anxious to obtain great deal in the way American training and equipment, but are willing to give nothing in return. To date they have told us nothing that was not obtainable from the newspapers. It may be that by assigning two full Colonels and a Navy Captain here at the beginning, we impressed these people with their importance to the United States and it might be a good idea if we let the pendulum swing in the opposite direction for a while … . the United States is not treated as a military friend or an ally. 
The facts in the book “Taking Sides” also support the facts highlighted by Colonel E.P. Archibald. “None of the three military attaches – Air Force, Army, and Navy – were allowed to have direct contact with their counterparts in the Israeli Defense Force (IDF). Instead, they all had to work through a “liaison office” of junior officers. The Air Attaches plane was not allowed to fly over Israel at all. Every flight plan field at Lydda Air field near Tel Aviv, where the plane was kept, had to be accompanied by a signed statement: that the pilot was aware that should he fly outside the prescribed corridor between Lydda and the Mediterranean, he would be fired upon. Even in the corridor was not safe. Archibald’s plane had in fact been fired upon in March of 1949, a bullet passing harmlessly through the tail section as it landed at Tel Aviv. 
US Military Attache patriot deplores the non-cooperative attitudes of the Jews.
“[The] U.S. has been furnished with organizational schemes and OB [Orders of battle] of practically every country in the world, the exception being Israel, U.S.S.R. and some of the satellites …. Even the simplest request such as …geographical locations or major commands is denied U.S. by Israel.”  Patriot Archibald reprimanded by Air Force Chief of Staff. “Finally, in September, Archibald, began to recommend against any assistance, any cooperation between the U.S. and Israeli militaries. Such assistance, he reasoned, should only be granted to an ally. Archibald’s comments and complaints became so strong, in fact, that the Air Force Chief of Staff felt it necessary to reprimand him for bias against the country that, nine months earlier, Archibald had felt was the “horse to back” for the United States in the Middle East. By early 1950, Archibald was totally alienated, and wrote to Air Force Intelligence that relations between his office staff and their counterparts in the Israeli Defense Forces were so bad that there was no way, except through actual spy operations,” that military information could be obtained. 
2.Patriot Acting Secretary of State Robert Lovett airs his fears about the Soviet penetration in the Middle East.
“In fact, when the State Department had first officially asked the Department of Defense to establish Army, Navy, and Air Force attaché offices in Tel Aviv, Acting Secretary of State Robert Lovett noted in a memo to Secretary of Defense James Forrestal that “the admixture of European races in Palestine offers a unique opportunity for Soviet penetration into a strategic area.” The new attaches in Israel, he said “should be qualified to observe Soviet activities, and should be thoroughly familiar with Soviet tactics.” The State Department thought the matter so urgent that the normal procedures for selecting and briefing military attaches were bypassed, and Archibald, Andrus, et al. were rushed to Tel Aviv to begin tracking the presumed Soviet involvement there. 
3. U.S. Army Attache patriot Colonel Andrus informs his superiors about the atrocities of the “restored” Jews.
“Archibald’s colleagues were also undergoing similar transformation during this period. The U.S. Army Attache in Tel Aviv, Colonel Andrus, wrote a memo in the last few months of 1949 to the Intelligence Division of the Army General Staff, citing wanton killing of Arabs and …denying access to their own land. 
“Taking Sides” reveals another heinous aspect of the “restored” Jews. They were hiring the journalists for managing the public opinion. “In November a request for military training in the United States by the Israelis was turned down, and a very critical article by correspondent Kenneth Bilby appeared in the New York Herald Tribune. Col. Andrus was outraged to learn that Bilby had submitted a draft of the article to Yigael Yadin of the Israeli Defense Force, and had accepted his corrections. This was the second time, Andrus wrote to Army Intelligence, that Israeli government had employed American journalists to “blackmail” the United States into providing training assistance. 
5. Patriot CIA warns that Arabs are alienated for the pro-Jewish policies of the Truman administration. “And by 1947, it was apparent to U.S. intelligence that the worldwide sympathy for Jewish immigration to the region, supported by an international Zionist underground, was destabilizing the area. In September of 1947 the Near East the CIA’s “Review of the World Situation as It Relates to the Security of the United States “assessed these development. “Zionist leadership, exploiting widespread humanitarian sympathy with the surviving Jews of Europe, has pursued its objectives without regard for the consequences. The Arab reaction is bitter and potentially violent, endangering not only the Jews in Palestine but also the strategic interests of the Western powers in the Near and Middle East, since the Arabs now identify the United States and the United Kingdom with Zionism.” 
6. Patriotic authors of the Joints Chiefs of Staff Paper warned about the true objectives of the “restored Jews. “By early 1948, U.S. government intelligence estimates reflected a deep concern that international Zionism was dragging the United States into a dangerous program of territorial conquest in the Middle East. In March, 1948, a Joint Chiefs of Staff paper on “Force Requirements for Palestine,” anticipating the termination of the British Mandate, predicted that the “Zionist strategy will seek to involve [the United States] in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives.” The JCS listed the objectives as (a) initial Jewish sovereignty over a portion of Palestine, (b) acceptance by the great powers of the right to unlimited immigration, (c) the extension of Jewish sovereignty over all Palestine, (d) the expansion of “Eretz Israel” into Transjordan and into portions of Lebanon and Syria, and (e) the establishment of Jewish military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East. “The JCS paper added ominously: “All stages of this program are equally sacred to the fanatically concepts of Jewish leaders. The program is openly admitted by same leaders, and has been privately admitted to United States officials by responsible leaders of the presently dominant Jewish group – the Jewish Agency. 
These patriots, are any body in the United States or in the World could stop the Jews to maintain their occupation of the Muslim Palestine? Answer is no. Jews had their way. They still occupy the Muslim Palestine.
Note 1. The main objective of the website is to arm the website visitors with documentary proofs for exposing the anti-humanity butchers. Whenever any excerpt is used, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny.org, and hinduleadershipwatchny.org. Thank you.
2. Excerpts submitted in this article prove the Jewish leadership anti-America role and their hidden agenda about Muslim Palestine. Notes. 1. “Confidential” letter to Col. Fred Pillet from Col. E.P. Archibald, dated December 19, 1949, Israel Air Attache Branch Station File, Record Group 341, Records of Headquarters USAF, National Archives, Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel, p.16. 2. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, p. 12 3. “Confidential” message MAI 177 from U.S. Military Attache, Tel Aviv, to Army Intelligence (CSGID), dated august 23, 1949, Confidential and secret Messages, Records of the Cable Section, Office of the Assistant Chief of secret messages, Records of the Cable Section, office of the Assistant Chief of Staff, G-2, Record Group 319, Records of the Army Staff, National Archives. P. 18.
4. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, p18 5. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, 19 6. Message MAI 213 from U.S. Military Attache, Tel Aviv, to Army Intelligence (CSGID), dated October 20, 1949, Confidential and Secret Messages, Records of the Cable Section, Office of the Assistant Chief Staff, G-2, Record Group 319, Records of the Army Staff, National Archives., p. 18-19.
7. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, P.19. 8. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, p. 20 9. “Top Secret” JCS paper 1684/11, dated March 31, 1948, copy in Decimal File 1946-1948, Plans and Operation Division, 091 Palestine TS (Section 11A, Case 6), Record Group 319, National Archives. P. 20-21.
10. Stephen Green, Taking Sides, America’s secret relations with a militant Israel, p. 25.
Part 6. US secret documents and occupation of Muslim Palestine by the White-European Jews
(Truman and British have different agenda about Muslim Palestine)(Israel: the bastard child of the United Nations) Posted: 11/1/2011. Updated: 12/07/2011. Updated: 12/08/2011
- British occupiers are reluctant to leave Palestine
- British occupiers are using every trick to sabotage the UN Partition Plan for continuing their occupation
Researcher – International Affairs
It is 1948. United States Representative at the United Nations Austin highlights the following facts.But first the excerpts from the telegram for a glance. Excerpts from the secret document
- “Palestine Commission report to SC on February 1 will probably charge UK with failure to observe provisions of GA resolution for progressive withdrawal…”
- …questions will be very sharp and designed to smoke out British implication that they will not cooperate with the Commission in any way.
Contents of the secret document: “501.BB Palestine/1-1948: TelegramThe United States Representative at the United Nations (Austin) to the Secretary of State
SECRET NEW YORK, January 19, 1948--1l p. m.
"67. Palestine Commission report to SC on February 1 will probably charge UK with failure to observe provisions of GA resolution for progressive withdrawal, and assert that under the conditions laid down by the British the Commission cannot proceed to Palestine, Bunche, Secretary of Commission, said in conversation with memberof USUN.
“Cadogan's recent statement to the Commission set forth an exact time table for British withdrawal. Informed Commission it could arrive in Palestine only two weeks before the British departure with all British Civil Service personnel. No British subjects would be seconded to the Arab or Jewish Governments and 'any British member of the Palestine Administrative Service accepting employment with new states would forfeit all pension rights. UK held that to allow British nationals to serve with new states would violate neutrality. Commission was bluntly warned that it must plan to recruit a civil administration ready to take over when British left. Asked how that could be done in two weeks. Cadogan said he did not know. (mytel 59, January 17').
"Bunche observed that "sheepishness" of Cadogan was greatest in answering that question. Bunche believes that it will be impossible to govern Palestine unless some experienced top-level British administrators can continue with both new states. Utilities, railroads and other essential services have mixed Arab and Jewish staffs, and few executives and supervisory personnel are available to replace top British civil servants.
“The Secretariat is preparing questions for Cadogan to answer at a later session. Bunche says questions will be very sharp and designed to smoke out British implication that they will not cooperate with theCommission in any way. Answers to questions will determine tone and content of February 1 report to SC.
" [Here follow six paragraphs dealing with such matters as the relations among the Commission, top Secretariat officers and British specialists on Palestine, and compensation to be paid to Commission members.]“Bunche is a close friend of long standing of USUN officer to whom foregoing told. He has never appeared more upset or more concernedabout a problem. He will draft the Commission's February 1 report to SC. He considers the British position indefensible, that Commissioncannot operate under present British plans and would be better advised to refuse to leave New York now than to attempt to implement GA decision under impossible conditions. He has every intention ofurging Commission to expose British position in SC and demand that showdown take place in New York before departure. He believes that Commission shares his view. He wryly remarked that he hoped that Department was actively formulating position for first week in February discussion in SC although he had gained impression US had false sense of security as regards its responsibilities in Palestine. 
1. Not printed
2. “Ambassador Austin, on January 27, reported information from Mr. Bunche that the Palestine Commission report would not draw conclusions or make charges. The Ambassador advised that "Despite previous indications that the report would severely criticize the British attitude, the commission feelsThat the British should have an opportunity to answer the questions recently put to Cadogan before any judgment is passed. Cadogan has said that some of the answers had to be cleared at Cabinet level, and certain material gathered in Palestine. Following receipt of these answers, the commission will senda special confidential report to the SC on the Palestine security problem. "However, the February 1 report will point out that it is impossible to meet the April 1 deadline for the establishment of provisional governments becausethe UK will not allow the commission to arrive in Palestine until two weeks before the British' leave." (Telegram 97 from New York, 501.BB Palestine/1- 2748)PPS Files, Lot 64 D 563, Near and Middle East, 1947-1948" (Source of document: Israel, Foreign Relations, 1948, Volume v, 544-545.)
Note1. The main objective of the website is to arm the website visitors with documentary proofs for exposing the anti-humanity butchers. Whenever any excerpt is used, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny.org, and hinduleadershipwatchny.org. Thank you. 2. This document provides some of the following proofs. Truman administration was not satisfied with the conduct of the British occupiers of Muslim Palestine and wanted to expose the British conduct.
No. 5. U.S. secret documents and occupation of Muslim Palestine by the White- European Jews. (Israel: the bastard child of the International community. Muslims were ready to stand against the victorious anti-Muslim Christian alliance of Great Britain, France, America, and its regional arms Bharat and Israel, which was led by Jewish Truman in 1948. Posted: 10/30/2011. Update: 12/07/2011. Update: 12/08/2011
- Muslims were determined to stand against the victorious anti-Muslim Christian alliance of World War Two that was led by Truman, grandson of Jewish Solomon. Why the Muslim leadership is selling the Palestinians and Kashmiris today to the dying anti-Muslim Christian alliance?
- Even traitor like king Abdullah could not dare to betray the cause of Palestinians in 1948
M.A. LL.B. Researcher- International Affairs
It is 1948. US Consul General Macatee at Jerusalem highlights the following facts. But first the excerpts from the telegram for a quick glance.
Excerpts from the secret document
“General national administration for whole Palestine will be established by Arabs on day British terminate mandate.” Secret Document “Believes Abdullahl  regardless private thoughts must accept Palestine Arab administration- although admits possibility various parts Palestine may be annexed to bordering states.”
Secret Document Contents of the secret documents “867N.01/1-1648: Telegram The Consul General at Jerusalem (Aacatee) to the Secretary of State SECRET JERUSALEM, January 16, 1948-6 p. m.
“62. Emile Ghory of AHE, just returned from Cairo meeting with Mufti, informed official ConGen following:
"1. General national administration of for whole Palestine will be established by Arabs on day British terminate mandate. Administration now being organized on basis Cairo press communique 5 January.
"2. Believes Abdullahl  regardless private thoughts must accept Palestine Arab administration- although admits possibility various parts Palestine may be annexed to bordering states. The line is that unimportant who takes over Palestine provided Palestine remains Arab. Preference is for unified Palestine state.
[Here follow Mr. Ghory's further thoughts, including the observations that Arab attacks on Jewish settlements were "for demonstration, training and probing purposes" and .that "Arms arriving increasing rate and young Arabs undergoing rigid training."] MACATEENote
“1. King of Transjordan.
” Source of the secret document. Israel, Foreign Relations, 1948, p. 543-544.
Note The main objective of the website is to arm the website visitors with documentary proofs for exposing the anti-humanity butchers. Whenever any excerpt is used, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny.org, and hinduleadershipwatchny.org. Thank you.
This document provides some of the following proofs. 1. Muslims were ready to fight the victorious alliance of World Warpa Two. 2. Even traitors like Abdullah could not dare to say no to the anti-occupation forces. 3. Compare the situation of 1948 to the situation of today. Muslim leadership is begging to the Jewish occupiers and their patrons for Palestinians rights.
No. 4. U.S. Secret documents and ocupation of Muslim Palestine by the White-European Jews.
(Israel: the bastard child of the United Nations. Partition cannot be legally enforced…. US Secret documents) Posted: 10/27/2011. Updated: 12/07/2011. Update: 12/08/2011
- The enforcement of the Partition Resolution by United Nation, Arab or Jewish forces will hurt the national interest of the United States
- Truman administration was facing problems in the enforcement of the Partition Resolution.
- Truman administration considered whether the Partition Resolution could be legally enforced- Truman administration was against referring any Palestinian matter to the International Court
-Bomb Tel Aviv and Delhi and then watch how many homegrown Hindu and Jewish terrorists mushroom
- Understanding between Saudi Arabia and Iran is a must to save the Muslim World from the anti-Muslim forces led by the United States
M.A., LL.B.Researcher – International Affairs
It is 1948. Secret memorandum by Mr. Robert M. McClintock to the Director of the Office of Political Affairs (Rusk) highlights the following facts. First, the excerpts from the documents are highlighted.
Excerpts from the memorandum, editorial notes and presses conference.
- Truman administration opts the policy of carrot and stick. “Inform Arabs that unless they cease hostilities we shall end arms embargo and permit recruitment by Jewish militia only.4. Inform Arabs if they keep the peace we shall not, as a government, provide Jewish state with more than strictly financial assistance.”
- Enforcement of Partition and the United Nations. “The conference was said to have been attended by Department of State officers and a panel comprising Messrs. Alger Hiss, Joseph Johnson, and Leo Pasvolsky, all of whom had previously filled positions of responsibility in the Department. Mr. Kurzman asserts that the unanimous opinion of the-panel was that the United Nations could not legally enforce the partition resolution as such but that it could use force against the Arabs should they sabotage partition by committing a breach of the peace.” -
Truman, grandson of Jewish Solomon and international law. “The United States should not support a motion in Security Council to refer any question on Palestine to the International Court.”
- (c) Truman administration and respect for the Security Council. “The United States should oppose reference to the Court, by the Security Council, of any question not pertinent to a matter before the Council (e.g., the general question whether the General Assembly had power to recommend a Palestine solution that did not have the consent of the inhabitants of Palestine) American troops will not be sent to Palestine. “News Conference of President Truman on January 15, 1948.  “Q. Mr. President, do you think, in view of the Palestine situation, that American troops might be sent to Palestine?“The President. I do not. I have no further comment to make on that. Probably in the long run we will have an international police force with the United Nations plan, to which all of us are working.” News Conference of President Truman on January 15, 1948”  Reprinted from Public Papers of the President of the United States: Harry S. Truman, 1948 (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1964), p.101.
Contents of the memorandum “501-BB Palestine/1-1448“Memorandum by Mr. Robert M. McClintock  to the Director of the Office of Special Political Affairs (Rusk)
Secret [Washington,] January 14, 1948.
Subject: The Problem of Enforcing Partition in Palestine
“The United States will presently be faced with a choice between two courses of policy consequent upon its decision to favor the partition of Palestine. One course is to support enforcement measures by the Security Council of the United Nations; the other is to support exclusive reliance on the Jewish and Arab militia which are to be established under the terms of the Assembly’s resolution on Palestine adopted November 29, 1947.
The adoption of either of these alternative policies will involve injury to the interests of the United States in greater or lesser degree and to the United Nations in greater or lesser degree. It is a question of sober judgment on balance which policy will most greatly injure the interests of the United States. In an endeavor to analyze this problem I have worked the following rough outline and have come forth with a suggested line of policy which falls far short of being satisfactory by any other standard than the fact that no line of policy applied to the present Palestine problem can prove satisfactory.
[Here follows outline of two courses.]
111. Possible US policy
1. Refusal to agree to SC enforcement measures.
2. Stress GA recommendation that Jewish and Arabs militia security forces in Palestine
.3. Inform Arabs that unless they cease hostilities we shall end arms embargo and permit recruitment, by Jewish militia only.
4. Inform Arabs if they keep the peace we shall not, as a government, provide Jewish state with more than strictly financial assistance.
5. Inform Jews that unless they keep the peace we shall deny them all hope of relaxing arms embargo and of economic or financial aid.
6. Seek creation by foregoing measures of an uneasy but actual local balance of power which will give the Palestine partition experiment a fair chance of being tried.
According to Dan Kurzman's Geneis 1948 The first Arab-Israeli War (New York, World Publishing Company, 1970), page 84, a"legal conference" was held early in January 1948 in Mr. Dean Rusk's office to consider whether the United Nations was empowered to enforce the partition resolution of November 29, 1947. The conference was said to have been attended by Department of State officers and a panel comprising Messrs. Alger Hiss, Joseph Johnson, and Leo Pasvolsky, all of whom had previously filled positions of responsibility in the Department. Mr. Kurzman asserts that the unanimous opinion of the-panel was that the United Nations could not legally enforce the partition resolution as such but that it could use force against the Arabs should they sabotage partition by committing a breach of the peace.
“Mr. Kurzman states that, as an aftermath of the meeting, Mr. McClintock sent a telegram to Ambassador Warren R. Austin, UnitedStates Representative at the United Nations, instructing him to call for a special session of the General Assembly to deal with the Palestineproblem on the grounds that partition could not be legally enforced. The Editors 'have been unable to find in the files of the Department of State any documentary record to substantiate this account of events.”
News Conference of President Truman on January 15, 1948
“ Q. Mr. President, do you think, in view of the Palestine situation, that American troops might be sent to Palestine?“
The President. I do not. I have no further comment to make on that. Probably in the long run we will have an international police force with the United Nations plan, to which all of us are working.
“ Q. Mr. President, could we go back to the question of Palestine? Do you mean in the long run there would be an international-police force in Palestine?
“The President. Not necessarily. Wherever it is necessary for the United Nations to use it and enforce its mandates.
1. Reprinted from Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Harry S. Truman, 1948
The Legal Adviser (Gross), in a memorandum of January 15, to Mr. Rusk, commented on a recommendation drafted by Mr. Rusk for the Under Secretary. The editors are unable to find Mr. Rusk's recommendation in the Department of State files. Mr. Gross' memorandum, however, summarized the recommendation as follows: "In your draft memorandum the problem was considered of what-position the United States should take in the Security Council of the United Nations in the event that a member of the Council should move 'to request an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legality of the action recently recommended by the General Assembly with respect to Palestine. The memorandum recommended that. The United States should support such a motion.’”
“After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the recommendation, the Legal Adviser concluded:
"(a) The United States should not support a motion in Security Council to refer any question on Palestine to the International Court;
"(b) The United States should oppose reference to the Court of any question on Palestine as a pre-condition to action by the Security Council in carrying out its responsibilities for the maintenance-of international peace and security; the United States should be prepared to vote against a reference under such circumstances, after consultation with other Security Council members to ascertain that such negative vote would not constitute a unilateral United States veto;
"(c) The United States should oppose reference to the Court, by the Security Council, of any question not pertinent to a matter before the Council (e.g., the general question whether the General Assemblyhad power to recommend a Palestine solution that did not have the consent of the inhabitants of Palestine); again, the United States should be prepared to vote against such a reference provided the negative vote did not result in a unilateral United States veto "(d), In other cases, of a motion in the Security Council to refer questions on Palestine to the Court the United States should not, support a reference and should abstain from voting." (51BB Palestine/1-1548)
Note:1. Rober M. McClintock, Special Assistant to Mr. Rusk.
Note. The main objective of the website is to help the website visitors to have proofs to expose the anti-humanity forces. Whenever any excerpt is used, please give the reference of muslimmediany.org, muslimdailyny.org, jewishleadershipwatchny, org, and hinduleadershipwatchny.org. Thank you
Part 2. Anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg destroys Christianity in Christian America. (Jewish-hired Christian prostitutes O’Reilly, Limbough, Hannity, Beck and others, can you dare to challenge anti-Christ Jewish Mayor of New York Bloomberg who is determined to destroy the Christian family structure. Jews and destruction of Christianity) Posted: 06/21/2011. Updated: 12/07.2011.
-Threats: The longer the Senate obstructs marriage equality, the heavier the price they will pay not only in the history books, but at the polls … Anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg
- Challenge: Government doesn’t have the right to prevent people from marrying …Anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg
- No body can stop: It’s an issue whose time has come. It’s not a question of if, but when … Anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg
- Buying the conscience: No matter where they stand on any other issue, Mr. Bloomberg is dangling a potent political carrot: his money and muscle in the next election
- Conspiracy to expose the anti-perversion forces: The public has a right to know where their legislators stand, and the only place you really find that out is when they have to register their vote publicly … Anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg
- Gay marriage a “moral” issue” for the Anti-Christ Mayor: “It’s really hard to look the mayor of the city of New York in the eye and say the people he represents who are L.G.B.T. are less than the people he represents who are heterosexual
- Few are standing against the Jewish tyranny: The Republican base is incredibly united on this issue. It’s a really bad idea to be for gay marriage if you’re a Republican, and I don’t think Mayor Bloomberg’s money is going to change that … Maggie Gallagher, the chairwoman of the National Organization for Marriage
Researcher – International Affairs
How much is pervert or how much is anti-Christ Jewish Mayor Bloomberg of New York? It does not matter that he is a pervert or an anti-Christ or both. What matter is that he is waging a war against the Christians state senators who are to vote against the perversion called same sex marriage. What matter is that he is threatening, offering bribes, and exposing those who dare to say No to the curse of same sex marriage. What matter is that he is determined to make “Hemi state,” New York/ Jewistan, a legally homosexual state. Remember Rev. Jesse Jackson was hanged by the Jewish terrorist and tyrants to label New York as Hemi-town. Destruction of Christianity has blinded anti-Christ mayor Bloomberg to that extent that he is ready to violate the mandates of Jewish Bible about same sex marriage. “Homosexuality in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) MenuLeviticus 18:22Overview: “This verse is one of the famous six "clobber" passages from the Bible that is often used to condemn same-sex sexual activity.“In the King James Version, Leviticus 18:22 is translated: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination."“Although the verse appears to most readers to apply only to sexual behavior between two males, at least two Bible translations appear to mistranslate the verse in order to widen its scope to include lesbian sexual activity:“Living Bible: "Homosexuality is absolutely forbidden, for it is an enormous sin New Living Translation: "Do not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin.” And note who is in bed with anti-Christ Jewish Mayor of New York on the same sex marriage. He is ‘Catholic’ Governor Andrew M. Cuomo. He is ready to be murdered by history instead of to be murdered by Jewish terrorist and tyrants. Other one who is in bed with the anti-Christ mayor is a lesbian City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn.
For Anti-Christ Bloomberg, supporting same sex marriage is standing on the right side of history.
“Urging lawmakers to put themselves on “the right side of history,” Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg visited the Capitol on Tuesday and vowed to support the re-election campaign of any Republican senator who votes to allow gay couples to wed.” Bloomberg to Lobby for N.Y. Marriage New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg will make his first trip to Albany for the exclusive purpose of lobbying for marriage equality on Tuesday. For six hours, the mayor plodded from one office to another in the mazelike legislative office building and the Capitol, across the street, meeting with six rank-and-file Republican senators whom gay rights advocates view as possible supporters of same-sex marriage, reports Jewish New York Times, May 17, 2011.
A Bloomberg administration spokesperson told The Advocate the mayor will meet with lawmakers including state senate majority leader Dean Skelos, who opposes the marriage equality bill but has said he will not prevent it from coming to the floor for a vote this session, a top priority of Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The mayor, a Republican turned independent, has been a major financial contributor to senate Republicans, whose support is needed to pass the measure. The bill failed in the senate in 2009 after passing the assembly three times. In addition to lobbying for same sex marriage, Bloomberg has donated at least $100,000 of his own money to the New Yorkers United for Marriage coalition of LGBT organizations working to pass the bill by June, and on May 25 he plans to hold a fundraiser for marriage equality featuring Rufus Wainwright at his foundation, where individual attendees will be asked to contribute from $10,000 to $25,000, according to an invited guest. The next day, the mayor will deliver a speech on marriage equality at Cooper Union that is expected to echo the themes of freedom and basic fairness expressed in his passionate address last summer in support of the mosque and community, reports Advocate.com
Bloomberg pledged to back senators who "stand up for marriage equality" and warned that those who don't could be left without his often-generous financial support.
"I certainly will concentrate and focus more on those that do," said Bloomberg, who has donated big bucks to Senate Republicans in recent years. Bloomberg Threatens To Stop Funding Republicans Who Don't Back Gay Marriage, reports Huffpost New York.
Note: The main objective of the websites is to provide the visitors with proofs. Please quote the following websites whenever you quote any proof from these websites.1.muslimmediany.org 2. muslimdailyny.org 3. jewishleadershipwatchny.org4.hinduleadershipwatchny.org
Why Jewish leadership writes its own obituary in Britain? May 2, 2005.
(Almost every article by the author is published in Muslim print media or is posted in Muslim websites. Posted on muslimmediany.org on March 8, 2010) Update: 12/08/2011
Jews have become politically insignificant in Great Britain, laments the Jewish leadership. Who is responsible? Muslims. “With the date of Britain’s general election set for May 5, some British politicians are falling over themselves to gain the vote of their Muslim constituents. With a population of close to two million Muslims, this is a prize worth winning. The Muslim vote is a relatively new phenomenon. There used to be Jewish vote, historically for Labour, but British Jews have become politically insignificant. The Jewish population of Britain has shrunk to a third of what it was after the Second World War; there are now only around 300,000 Jews in Britain.” -- (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnittzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Another factor which Jewish leadership views as a final punch to its monopoly in Great Britain is the concentration of Muslim in certain areas. This concentration makes the Muslims heavy weight as voting block in specific constituencies, leaving the contestants heavily dependent on their votes.
“The Muslims, however, are a rising force to be reckoned with. They are concentrated in Britain’s more deprived areas of Tower Hamlets, Newham and Hackney (also home to the large Stamford Hill Jewish community) in London, Luton to the north of London, Birmingham in the Midlands and in the former manufacturing towns of the north England.” -- (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnittzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
And Muslims are using this concentration to teach a lesson to the politicians who are pursuing the anti-Muslims policies. Glaring example is the targeting of Foreign Secretary Jack Straw by the Muslims for his anti-Muslim role.
“Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has encountered problems in his constituency of Blackburn, in northern Britain, home to a large Muslim community where the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, he described as an extremely unpleasant and very well funded organization has attempted to unseat him. MPAC distributed leaflets to homes and mosques calling Straw a Zionist and suggesting that he was subject to the dictates of pro-Israel groups including the Board of Deputies of British Jews. A picture in the leaflet showing Mr. Straw shaking hands with Ariel Sharon implied he was in the pay of the Israeli government.” -- (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnittzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Organizational skills of the Muslims also worry the Jewish leadership.
“Mainstream Muslims in this country have become much more organized in terms of being members of the community and lobbying for their own causes, said Peter Ridddell, professor at the London School of Theology and Centre for Islam Studies.” -- (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnittzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
And these organizational skills are paying off. There are Muslim representatives, Muslim organizations are representing Muslims, and heads of political parties are granting interviews to Muslim News papers
“There are five Muslim peers in the House of Lords, Two Muslim MP’s and 12 city mayors. The Muslim Council of Britain, established in 1997, the most influential Muslim organization in the country, act as the government’s liaison with its Muslim population. It comes as no surprise that the Muslim News, Britain’s leading Muslim newspaper, was granted interviews with Tony Blair and Michael Howard, leaders of the Labour and Conservative parties.” (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Muslim swelling numbers, concentration in certain areas and organizational skills are paying off in another way. Politicians are showering praises over the Muslims. In the past such types of lavish praises were exclusively for the Jews.
“At the Muslims News Awards for Excellence in London, Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown was eager to praise the Muslim community in Britain. As chancellor, I want to acknowledge the enormous contribution the Muslim community makes to our economy. British Muslims are playing a vital role in the next stage of Britain’s economic development.
“There have been other more ingratiating efforts to secure the Muslim votes. Mike O’Brien, minister for energy in the Department of Trade and Industry and Labour MP for North Warwickshire, issued an obsequious message on behalf of the Labour Party. He hangs his argument for Labour’s reelection of the convenient peg of the Blair- Bush partnership, contending that only this alliance is capable of bringing about the Palestinians state that Muslim dream of.” (British Politicians Court Muslim Votes, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Jewish leadership is also irked for O’Brien close relations with Muslim community and his concerns for Muslim causes. What makes the Jewish leadership more upset that Mr. O’Brien tells the world that Prime Minister have read the Quran.
“O’Brien presents himself to the Muslim community in Britain as their emissary to the Palestinians, sent by Tony Blair to visit Yasir Arafat in the Muqata in Ramallah to convey the message that we had not abandoned him. He praised Blair for being the first prime minister to have ever read the Quran, to quote from it and to talk about it. Can anyone imagine Margaret Thatcher or John Major doing the same.”? (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnittzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
To court Muslim votes, Labor Party is informing the Muslims that how kind it has been to Muslims and its causes. It also promises pro-Muslim acts in the future. It tells the Muslims that it was labor party that approved state funding for the Muslims. And again it is the Labor party that would end religious discrimination.
“In further unctuous statements about the advantage to Muslims of a Labour government that gave state funding to Muslim schools … O’Brien goes on to assure Muslims that as a result of lobbying by the Muslim Council of Britain the prime minister promised that the next Labour government would ban religious discrimination. Muslims see this as a major victory …” (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005.
The Jewish leadership pins its hope with British National Party to counter the ‘pro-Muslims policies’ of the Labor Party. The Jewish leadership is happy that BNP is not only against the Muslims but it also does not hesitate to demonize their religion Islam. Another encouraging factor for the Jewish leadership is that in the past BNP was focusing on the Jews; now it is targeting the Muslim. Jewish leadership publicizes the anti-Muslim and anti-Islam statement and acts to widen the gulf between the two. It is the old tactics of the Jewish leadership that it tries hard to fuel the hatred between its two enemies. It is applying the same trick to Muslims and BNP.
“One British political party that is not angling for the Muslim vote is the British National Party, a far right xenophobic group that believes all immigration should be halted and that Britain is being harmed by ethnic minorities. It bases its election platform on an unequivocally hostile attitude to Islam. The BNP occasionally manages to get one or two candidates elected in deprived areas where local population fear the influx of predominantly Muslim immigrants whom they perceive as a threat. The BNP has no love for Jews either but right now, pre-election, most of its venom is reserved for Muslims. It s leader Nick Griffin who was recently arrested on the charge of inciting racial hatred when he denounced Islam as “a wicked, vicious faith that has expanded through a handful of cranky lunatics about 1300 years ago until is now sweeping county after county has been vociferous in urging those members of the electorate he could persuade to listen to him, insisting, there is nothing irrational about fearing Islam. It’s a menace to all we in the West hold dear and the time when anyone can pretend otherwise is almost at an end.” (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Author Rachel Rogosnitzky brings another factor to embarrass Muslims and the BNP. The BNP official publication The Voice of Freedom is published by a Muslim company and staffed by Muslim. The BNP has a justification for choosing a Muslim printing press.
“The affairs of the British National Party experienced an interesting twist recently when it emerged that its officials publication, The Voice of Freedom, which is full of invective against Islam, describing it as a dangerous religion, is produced at a British printing works owned by a Saudi Arabian company and staffed by Muslims, specializing in printing Islamic newspapers in Britain and the Middle East. The January edition of The Voice of Freedom urges an end to the growth of Islam in Britain and contains articles warning about the Islamifacation (sic) of British systems of justices, education and government. The BNP defended its choice of printer, saying, if you would like to go and get a wholly owned British firm that would print our newspaper, fair enough. Islam is not compatible with Western Christian values in Britain but it is not their printing works that are dangerous to our way of life, it is the other things they do.” (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jew Press, April 22, 2005)
Another factor that makes the author smiles is the opposition to end the religious discrimination of Muslim promised by Labor Administration. Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said
“This legislation will curb freedom of speech without any benefit being realized. The best remedy for evil ideas is more speech, not less.”
Muslims religious discriminations is supported and justified on account of freedom of speech.
“Restraining the right to criticized other religions would end centuries of tolerance in Britain and could end up inflaming tensions between religious groups. Some critics have said that the proposed religious hatred law is no more than a cynical attempt to buy hard-line Muslim votes.” (British Politicians Court Muslim Vote, Rachel Rogosnitzky, The Jewish Press, April 22, 2005)
Why is Jewish leadership exclusively allowed to demonized Christianity and Islam under the banner of freedom of speech? Why one criticizing word about the activities of the Jewish leadership is a crime and a sin and is not protected by the same principle of freedom of speech? Why anybody who tries to defend its own community, its own religion, or the humanity from Jewish leadership is lynched by the Jewish mob – called the Jewish leadership? Freedom of speech should be for every body and not only for the Jewish leadership and its paid agents to demonize anybody they dislike. BIG QUESTIONS: 1. POLITICAL POWER? Why the Jewish leadership is writing its own obituary and blaming the Muslim for cornering it in the political arena? Why it is painting Muslims as a political force in Great Britain. The simple answer is that Jewish leadership is playing the centuries’ long trick – portraying itself as the victim. 2. Is Jewish leadership is a victim? Take the case of Great Britain? Can any administration in Great Britain dare to challenge the monopoly of the Jewish leadership on the political system? Can any administration in Great Britain adopt anti-Israeli policy? The answer is no to both questions. Has the Muslim presence in Great Britain, France, Germany and other countries have put a dent in the Jewish leadership power? The answer is again no. Jewish leadership is still in a position to get what it wants in Great Britain. Note the occupation of Iraq. Jewish leadership wanted it and got it. The only thing that has happened is that Muslim presence has created a bump to the free ride enjoyed by the Jewish leadership in Great Britain and elsewhere. And this bump is intolerable for the Jewish leadership. So demonization of Muslims and their religion is the top priority of the Jewish leadership. Jewish leadership wants to make them the most detested community in Europe and elsewhere. The eventual goal is ethnic cleansing of Muslims in Europe and elsewhere. One way to demonize the Muslim in the European Union is to portray them as manipulator of political system. 3. MUSLIM NUMBERS? Why does the Jewish leadership flash again and again the Muslim population in European Union and in America? It wants to contain their numbers. It knows that numbers matter. If not to day, tomorrow they will matter. In this background, note the Jewish leadership anti-Muslim stance on immigration. Note the declining numbers of the Muslims from the Muslims World coming to America. . Note the restraints against Muslim students in the United States. Note the ethnic cleansing of the Muslims communities in the Untied States – detention and deportation. All these acts send a very blunt message to the Muslim World. Muslims are not welcome in the United States and elsewhere in Europe. And the Jewish leadership is the author of this message. 4. AND WHAT ABOUT THE SO-CALLED PRO-MUSLIM POLICIES OF LABOR ADMINISTRATION Labor administration is portrayed in the article as a pro-Muslim administration in the article “British Politicians Court Muslim Vote.” It is a very cruel joke. Cosmetic acts have no weight or relevance. Note how many anti-Muslims laws are passed by the Labor administration against the Muslim under the banner of terror. Note the Labor administration role in the occupation of Iraq. This is another trick of the Jewish leadership that it projects its best friends as its enemy to make them credible in the eyes of its enemies. Prime Minister Blair is sold to the Muslim world as a friend of the Muslim World; in reality it is only a propaganda trap. MUSLIMS SHOULD BE VIGILANT Muslim organizational skills are highlighted in the article. One Muslim organization is depicted as the “government’s liaison with its Muslim population.” Muslim does not need an organization, which cater or advocate the government views. Muslims need an organization or organizations, which represent their concerns and not what the governments want to hear.
Muslim leadership in America wrote a shameful chapter in the last mayoral election of New York City. In that election, local Muslim leadership sided publicly with Jewish Mark Green against Hispanic Mr. Ferrer. Why was it wrong? First, Mr. Fernando Ferrer belongs to the Community of Color. And members of the Communities of Color (African- Americans, Hispanics and others) in Congress stand for civil liberties and pro-immigrant policies. Third, Jewish leadership monopoly on the power must end. They must be trimmed to their size as their representation in different agencies is concerned. In power, Jewish leadership uses its official capacity to bribe, favor and influence. Now again mayoral election is fast approaching. Jewish Mark Green robbed Mr. Ferrer last time. Jewish Machine was successful to pit Jewish Bloomberg against Jewish Green. Outcome of the election was inconsequential. A Jew was certain to win. Now again it will be a contest between Jewish billionaire Bloomberg and possibly Mr. Ferrer. The criticism that Mr. Ferrer is getting will hurt Mr. Ferrer and it will strengthen Mr. Bloomberg. And do not forget, he is the same Bloomberg who bought the mayoral election with more 60 million dollars, slapping in the face of 8 million New Yorkers. Communities of Color are 65 percent of the New York City. They should be represented of their own and not by a white-skin Jewish billionaire. A note of caution. Will Mr. Ferrer stand with the Muslims against the Jewish leadership? The answer is no. He might prove worst than Jewish Ed. Kotch, Mayor Julliani and Jewish Bloomberg. Even then he is a brother. Siding with the Communities of Color, Muslims will take a first step to an eventual alliance with the Communities of Color. Jewish leadership will never be an ally of the Muslims. On National level, Muslim leadership also wrote a shameful chapter in the recent presidential election. It endorsed Jewish Kerry. Jewish Kerry political agenda was worst than President Bush. Jewish Kerry was not criticizing President Bush for his destructive policies against the Muslim World. He was criticizing President Bush for not doing enough to destroy the Muslim world. Jewish Kerry was echoing more destructive polices against the Muslim World. Jewish Kerry wanted to marginalize Saudi Arabia, take military action against Sudan, and ‘denuclearize’ Iran. There was no justification to endorse Jewish Kerry. It was more honorable that Muslim leadership had boycotted the presidential election. Muslim leadership did write a glorious chapter by endorsing and supporting Congresswoman Nadia against Jewish Stephen J. Solarz Congressman of Brooklyn and Bombay. So Muslims of America and Europe, be vigilant. If Muslim leadership prefers its preferences on the expanse of the Muslim interests, make sure they cannot deliver.
Jewish World Knesset of Israel Monday, January 10, 2005
(Almost every article by the author is published in Muslim print media or is posted on Muslim Websites. Posted on muslimdailyny.org on December 28, 2009. Update: 12/08/2011
- Jewish World Knesset does not believe in national borders for the Jews of the world. Also Jewish Israel has no border for the Jews of the world. They are not Americans or Polish. They are only living in these countries. They are only Jews and only Israelis. And the Jewish World Knesset will achieve the objective of ‘Jews first’ and ‘Israeli first’ by creating a Jewish civilization to make them One.
M.A., LL.B. Researcher – International Affairs
Cat is no more in the bag. It is out of the bag. Israel is giving the Jews of the world the right to vote and to represent themselves through their representatives in Israeli Knesset. In other words, world will see another proof that how an occupying race operating from an occupied territory, Palestine, claims the only ‘democracy’ in the world and now it will represent Jews of the world. World will see that French, British, Germans, Russians, Polish, Moroccan, Turkish, Indian, Venezuelans and Jews from other countries sitting in the Jewish Knesset and taking part as members of the Israeli Jewish Knesset. World will see that 11 Jewish senators of the United States are also the member of the Jewish Israeli Knesset, representing Jewish Israeli State in the U.S. Senate and representing U.S. in the Jewish Israeli Knesset. In a Jewish occupied world, any thing can happen. So world will see that more than 20 Jewish members of the U.S. House of Representatives sitting in the Jewish Knesset of Israel and taking part as members of the Israeli Jewish Knesset. And who knows that one day a Jewish president of the United States will also be the president of the Jewish state called Israel. Jewish Karmon, brother of Jewish-rooted Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Kerry, publicly declares that Israel is the 51st State of the United States of America.
Plan for a Jewish World Knesset was unmasked at the Jewish Knesset’s Committee for Immigration and Absorption. Special meeting was held at the official residence of the President Moshe Katzav. And he was the one who introduced the plan for Jewish World Knesset. Drafter of the Jewish World Knesset (Parliament) is the Jewish Agency. It prepared a 600-page report for creating a Jewish World Knesset at Israel. The 50-page executive summary was due last month. Prime Minister Sharon was in the loop.
“The proposal for a world Jewish consultative ‘parliament’ was initially raised last July in a strategic policy report submitted to Prime Minister Sharon by the quasi-government Jewish Agency for Israel, Israel’s designated liaison to the Jewish communities of the Diaspora.
” The report was prepared by a newly-formed Jewish Agency think tank for global Jewish policy, chaired by the former American diplomat Dennis Ross.” (Israeli President Unveils Plan for World Knesset,” Forward, December 17, 2004.
There are certain objectives that the Jewish leadership wants to achieve by forming World Jewish Knesset. It reminds the Jews of the world that they are Jewish first and after that they are Americans, French, Germans, Polish, Russians, British and Indians. It reminds the Jews that they are the Israeli citizens first under “Law of Return” and then they are the citizens of the country where they are living. Under “Law of Return,” a Jew living in any country can return to Israel as its citizen. Even today an American or an Australian Jew is the citizen of Israel.
How will the objectives of ‘Jews first’ and ‘Israel first’ be achieved by the World Jewish Knesset at Israel? First, World Jewish Knesset will be ‘inclusive’ to achieve the objective of ‘Jews first’ and ‘Israel first.’ The representatives of the Jews of the world will involve themselves in framing the policy for Jews living in Israel and all around the world. These representatives from other countries with their Israeli counterparts will macro-manage and micro-manage all aspects of life of world Jewry - from Internet use to summer camp staffing.
“The 50-page report, an executive summary of a 600-page document due out this month, reviewed security, political, religious, cultural and economic conditions in Jewish communities on every continent and make a host of recommendations ranging from Internet use to summer camp staffing. Among the key proposals was the formation of an international representative body to consult with the Israeli government on decisions that may affect Jewish security or culture in other countries.” (Israel President Unveils Plan for World Knesset, Forward, December 17, 2004)
Second, Jewish World Knesset will achieve the objective of ‘Jews first’ and ‘Israel first’ by becoming the custodian of the Jewish ‘security’ and ‘culture’ of the Jews on every continent. It will bridge the conceptual and philosophical ‘divide’ of the Jews and make them one. It will advocate a greater bond between Israeli Jews and Jews living in other parts of the world and make them one. It will learn from the Jews all around the world to make them one. It will foster feeling of fellowship among the Jews around the world to make them one. Jewish World Knesset does not believe in national borders for the Jews of the world. Also Jewish Israel has no border for the Jews of the world. They are not Americans or Polish. They are only living in these countries. They are only Jews and only Israelis. And the Jewish World Knesset will achieve the objective of ‘Jews first’ and ‘Israeli first’ by creating a Jewish civilization to make them One.
“Judaism is seen as more than religion or a nationality, but as civilization. The State of Israel has as a duty to preserve Judaism where ever it may be, as a higher priority even than [fostering] immigration.” (Israeli President Unveils Plan for World Knesset, Forward, December 17, 2004).
Numerous reasons or justifications are given for the creation of the Jewish World Knesset. One is that Jews living in the occupied Palestine, called Israel, do not have the right to make decisions that affect the world Jewry.
“We in Israel do not have the right to make decisions on our own that affect world Jewry. Even if, God willing, 60% of Jews on earth live in Israel, will still have to consult. That is why it is important that this house shall arise.” (Israeli President Unveils Plan for World Knesset, Forward, December 17, 2004)
Other reason given for the creation of Jewish World Knesset is to eliminate the sense of disconnection between Israelis and their cousin - World Jewry. And above all the main reason of Jewish World Knesset is to ‘save’ the Jews living in Latin America and Europe from Muslims who are also living in these continents.
“The report suggested that Israeli security policies can have the unintended effect of arousing hostility toward Jewish communities among émigré Arab populations in places such as Europe and Latin America, with occasionally violent results.” (Israeli President Unveils Plan for World Knesset, Forward, December 17, 2004)
The Jews who will be represented in the Jewish World Knesset at Israel will come from these countries. Muslims and the world should know what is the Jewish numerical strength in these countries is: 1. Afghanistan 502. Albania 503. Algeria 1504. Argentina 120,0005. Armenia 5006. Aruba & Curacao 5007. Australia 52,5008. Austria 6,0009. Azerbaijan 6,00010. Bahamas 30011. Barbados 5512. Belarus 14,00013. Belgium 15,00014. Bermuda 12515. Bolivia 32016. Bosnia Herzegovina 1,10017. Brazil 62,50018. Bulgaria 3,25019. Canada 181,00020. Chile 12,50021. China 1,55022. Colombia 1,90023. Costa Rica 2,50024. Croatia 65025. Cuba 1,50026. Czech Republic 5,00027. Denmark 4,50028. Dominican Rep 15029. Ecuador 50030. Egypt 24031. El Salvador 10032. Estonia 1,00033. Ethiopia 10034. Fiji 4035. Finland 75036. France 325,00037. Germany 45,00038. Gibraltar 60039. Great Britain and N. Ireland 133,50040. Greece 2,40041. Guatemala 1,75042. Haiti 15043. Holland 12,50044. Honduras 75045. Hungary 50,00046. India 5,60047. Iran 27,00048. Iraq 7549. Ireland 89550. Israel 2,423,50051. Italy 17,50052. Jamaica 35053. Japan 2,00054. Kazakhstan 7,00055. Kenya 33056. Latvia 5,40057. Lebanon 10058. Libya 5059. Lithuania 5,50060. Luxembourg 100061. Malta 5062. Mexico 48,00063. Moldova 20,00064. Morocco 5,80065. New Zealand 3,30066. New Caledonia 12067. Norway 6,0068. Panama 2,50069. Paraguay 90070. Peru 2,50071. Poland 1,75072. Portugal 50073. Puerto Rico 1,50074. Romania 6,25075. Russia 220,00076. Singapore 30077. Slovakia 3,00078. South Africa 45,00079. Spain 12,50080. Surinam 15081. Sweden 9,00082. Switzerland 8,80083. Syria 1,50084. Tahiti 13085. Taiwan 18086. Thailand 25087. Trinidad 1088. Tunisia 1,50089. Turkey 25,00090. U.S.A. 2,900,00091. Uruguay 12,50092. Ukraine 150,00093. Uzbekistan 35,00094. Venezuela 10,00095. Virgin Islands 50096. Yemen North 1,00097. Yugoslavia (Serbia) 90098. Zaire 10099. Zambia 35100. Zimbabwe 700 Above numbers are estimated numbers and they are inflated numbers.
Slash at least half of the numbers whenever Jewish leadership airs its number. The reason is that Jewish leadership always inflates the numbers to grab political clout. Jewish leadership claims that there are 13,000,000 million Jews in the world. It claims that there are 1,600,000 Jews in Europe, 6,483,900 in North America and South America, 4,932,900 in Asia, including 4,847,000 in Israel, 89,800 in Africa and 101,900 in Oceania. Slashed these numbers to about 6 million in the entire world.
Note in 1980 and 1990, world was told that they are more than 2 to 3 million Jews in Russia. What happened to them when their immigration started? Only 900,000 emigrated from Russia according to Jewish leadership. Now world is told that out of these 900,000 Russian immigrants, only about 400,000 are Jews. Others are ‘fake Jews.’ Second, come to New York and note how many Jews you see in a given day in Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx and Staten Island. How many kosher restaurants are in these areas? They determine the number of a community.
What are the political implications of a Jewish World Knesset for Muslims in America? The main goal of every Jewish organization is to destroy the Muslim World. Muslim leadership must educate the Jews living in their countries that they are citizens of the Muslim countries. They must stop spying for Israel. Second, Jews living in the non-Muslim countries must be educated that they are paying the price of genocidal policies of Jewish leadership in occupied Palestine. They do not want to be treated as the Christians and Muslims are treated by the Jewish leadership in occupied Palestine called Israel.
Note how many enquires are conducted at this moment against the Jews for alleged charges of spying for ‘Israel’ in the Untied States. It is a very critical time for the Muslim all over the world. Occupation of Jewish leadership has come full circle. It is the time to expose the designs of the Jewish leadership that is using the U.S. military muscles to save its own skin. Only Allah is Aleam and Basir.